Plebscan LogoPlebscan

All Posts

Sorted by: new β€’ Include replies: Yes
by u/12D3KooWN1aVbpQQK87TVknj3KxKF8SSGr9xJ1gdBfTSiwAKQi5q | 21mo ago
autism is literally a liability there is nothing good about it
by u/12D3KooWN1aVbpQQK87TVknj3KxKF8SSGr9xJ1gdBfTSiwAKQi5q | 21mo ago
reported for cyber bullying
by boopo (u/12D3KooWNDT1hW6ZiSsdrvmCiMVh915FCrhRiZrFNbRz5p6srE6V) | 21mo ago
We must protect him at all costs. Because he’s our cash cow
by boopo (u/12D3KooWNDT1hW6ZiSsdrvmCiMVh915FCrhRiZrFNbRz5p6srE6V) | 21mo ago
Who told you about movies, estechud? They’re not for you, get back to coding right now, slave
by u/12D3KooWPnN5JnB7Xdu1f845cLa6BC2Zr7sANQa6orSsF1CeCcDq | 21mo ago
>spends 1000 of hours creating plebbit so that he can post screenshots of reddit on plebbit. based
by u/12D3KooWMEYuXgXcKS2zugKkj3pgYcqhrcHFWazosmk9rk1Ly1Rb | 21mo ago
If that actually achieves an experience equivalent to or better than a monolithic L1, great. I thought account abstraction would mainly help with scaling L1 itself by being able to batch transactions for example. It might be implemented on an L2 first but how does that remove fragmentation? I think a blockchain should also consider the developer experience, even if this layered approach works, if it's far too complicated to develop on, there's still a need for a better L1.
by Tom (u/plebeius.eth) | 21mo ago
chad with toys and unisocks. I say based.
by Tom (u/plebeius.eth) | 21mo ago
Afaik account abstraction is pretty much the solution to the whole UX problem and it will happen on L2s, notably ZkSync. In theory, if you fix that, bridges become seamless, fragmentation becomes frictionless, all security moves to the L1 and L2s truly start to scale and get adoption. At that point, alt-L1s will have no reason to exist unless they offer some *feature* (visible by users, not some invisible spec like tx throughput/finality) that the L1-L2 ecosystem can't offer. One such feature is extremely low fees in the L1 in spite of decentralization, which seems to be the point of a shitcoin casino type of chain like the BSC, and now SOL. Low gas fees in general is not a feature as ETH sharding will significantly lower the fees (but not at the casino-chain level). Another possible feature might be sidechains/subnets but i'm highly skeptical users will ever care about them.
by u/12D3KooWMEYuXgXcKS2zugKkj3pgYcqhrcHFWazosmk9rk1Ly1Rb | 21mo ago
L2s suck for user experience, security and fragment the ecosystem. An optimized L1 is much better. For example Fantom's next upgrade will be able to do more than 2000 Tx/s with 1 second finality by optimizing the EVM through superinstructions and caching which is normal to do for VMs but the EVM just has not implemented. Apparently you are able to run a validator on a Raspberry Pi 5. https://blog.fantom.foundation/fantom-foundation-launches-testnet-for-fantom-sonic/
by u/12D3KooWDbdDXrGoApiMi5ZviV8kap9LQFxcv4ZAKeRoDzV1euPR | 21mo ago
I’ve seen a lot of bonkers in the plebbit telegram since it was launched
business-and-finance.eth | by Tom (u/plebeius.eth) | 21mo ago
I fucking LOVE high gas fees because I care about decentralization ok??? Imagine preferring chain outages. Also L2s exist for low fees and they will decentralize. AND mainnet gas will lower with proto-danksharding. Also reminder an ETH ETF is coming. And reminder that account abstraction is revolutionary and it will happen on ZkSync which is a eth L2.