2 direct replies

Instead of the plebbit client, which messed up the formatting of my post previously, I am now posting from the plebchan client. I have redone the formatting. Hopefully this works. The ability to expand the shitpost box is nice. Interesting post. It's also worth arguing that if you look at infection rate graphs relative to when the mass vaccination program was implemented, the infection rate peaked and began declining often years before the mass vaccination campaign was implemented. Further, the Spanish flu could have just been the effects of mass poisoning. This was due to the "standard of care" which included arsenic, mercury, electroshock therapy and even letting people 'bleed out' the virus. The description of 'blue black' skin resembled cyanosis or lack of oxygen which would be the result of the aforementioned standards of care. It could be possible that paxlovid, remdesivir, and the vaccines (possibly causing antibody dependent enhancement and blood clotting) caused the side effects reported in many jurisdiction's adverse effects systems, similar to the Spanish Flue? This is especially possible if we consider the cumulative effects of radiation on human body and the genome, covered in the book "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg. Could the seemingly ever increasing radiation of humanity due to modern innovations cause progressively more illnesses? What do you think about the lipid nano particle technology that some people have raised? Some have purportedly found self-assembling particles shown here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany** https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/hydrogel-in-injectable-medications?** You also have this weird spanish study claiming MAC address emittance/self-assembling structures post injection. Is this trolling or is it real? It is the La Quinta Columna study from Spain: http://ukcitizen2021.org /Case_Briefing_Document_and_lab_report_Ref_AUC_101_Report%20.pdf Note that while authorities denied that there are lipid nano particle technology inside the vaccines, recently the "THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S 2023 BUDGET" on page 3 wrote : '(1) Pandemic preparedness: research and regulatory review of nanotechnology-enabled COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, including on lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA vaccines and new efforts to develop nanoparticle “universal” vaccines'. You can read this document on the official website: https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/NNI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf It begs the question, **why did governments around the world insist this wasn't the case? And why do they want to implement this gene therapy technology? Is it just profit seeking? Is it with a trans-humanist intention (to augment man with machine?) Or, is it depopulation? (note rising mortality across the most vaccinated countries - refer to Edward Dowd's work on excess deaths. https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Projects.htm#Nav_ExcessDeaths It is interesting to note that the intelligence firm, Deagle, predicted a massive Malthusian population collapse by 2025. According to this source, WikiLeaks docs revealed Deagle was legitimately used a reference material in a Stratfor report on the technological capabilities of the North People’s Republic of Korea. https://hillmd.substack.com/p/deagelcom-predicts-up-to-80-population https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/ Additionally, we have the reorganization of the food supply, towards MRNA food with some universities such as the University of California touting 'innovations' such as MRNA lettuce, which if subject to lax labeling requirements would completely undermine the Hippocratic Oath and free and informed consent (to vaccination). https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines We have the push towards GMO food as being more 'sustainable', capable of 'enduring climate change'. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/the-future-of-eating-gm-crops.html We have the Dutch farmers being forced to further constrain their nitrogen use and in some cases forcibly sell their farms, while in Ireland, there is the consideration of culling 200,000 cattle. Farmers are having their livelihood forcibly ripped out from under them, highlighting issues of property ownership (or lack there of). https://www.foxnews.com/world/elon-musk-farmers-torch-ireland-government-proposal-slaughter-200k-cows-meet-eu-climate-change-goals We have the movement of synthetic meat ('cultured meat', which is a euphemism for tumor meat). If the controllers provide as much intellectual honesty, transparency and consideration of 'adverse effects' as they have with the vaccines, then such a reorganization of the food supply is cause for concern, regarding issues of whether the meat may metastasize inside the body, notwithstanding remaining issues of forced 'vaccination' or gene altering additives or recombinant technology in the meat (if they can put MRNA in the lettuce, described above why can't they do so with meat eventually?). The World Eccomunist Forum touts "why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food systems." Yet, as above, if they failed in their covid vaccine due diligence, then are they going to rigorously pursue issues of the indigestibility of chitin and the potential for kidney stones and other ailments, which may occur when ingesting bug derived food in quantity? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/why-we-need-to-give-insects-the-role-they-deserve-in-our-food-systems/ We have the novel concept of the C40 'sustainable' smart city. On page 20 (of the double sided brochure itself) or page 11 of the document (collating both pages), they purport to considerably reducing emissions by 60% by 2050, in most consumption facets - less meat, more bugs/cultured tumors, government mandated energy consumption limits, travel restrictions, clothing limits, and goods purchasing limits). <span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;">https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/c/arup-c40-the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1-5c-world.pdf Such a system would likely be expressed through a "carbon credit system" which allocates carbon credits in a specific amount to all citizens. The only way to get more is to purchase them however, it is not unreasonable to assume that the price for carbon credits may be prohibitively expensive for the masses, meaning they are resigned to their 'smart city' pods, where property ownership is dream for all but the elite, and where social mobility is near impossible. This expression of manufactured Malthusianism through totalitarianism is supported by sources such as the Club of Romes', infamous 'Limits to Growth' report which seems to coincide with the actual intent behind Agenda 2030 (manufacture an orchestrated social, political, economic and infrastructure decline, which concentrates power in the few who pull the strings from Switzerland, London, NYC, and Washington. Indeed, the government continues to insist on legislative change that impinges on individual liberties, justified under the pretext of being for the 'greater good' evidenced through surveillance legislation across the world, the move to ban encryption apps and messaging, anti-terror laws and most recently, the proposed health legislation changes such as the recent IHR health amendments set to be passed around May 2024, which have room to erode state sovereignty on health issues. The source for that is James Roguski's work on his substack covering the proposed amendments. https://substack.com/@jamesroguski There is also the undeniable movement towards an 'internet id' which removes each citizens' capacity to verbally criticize or debate international or national public policy, especially if social media is connected to a social credit score and central banking digital currency, meaning public services as simple as transport or banking infrastructure is unavailable or undermined, for 'wrongthink' (criticizing government corruption). Perhaps the necessary disaster through which the controllers seek to implement this social credit score, carbon credit score and digital ID, is through a cyber pandemic that temporarily shuts off all internet and energy infrastructure, wherein these aforementioned measures would function as the 'vaccine'. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/02/06/cyber-apocalypse-2023-is-the-world-heading-for-a-catastrophic-event/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/protecting-critical-infrastructure-from-cyber-pandemic/ In summary, I ask, what do you think the goals are for these gene therapy interventions? What do you think about the lipid nano particle technology and its purpose (explicit or implied) and do you think depopulation is one goal of those who pushed mass vaccination (or is this to ridiculous and far-fetched?). As a final point the depopulation argument is somewhat compelling, in addition to arguments regarding data harvesting, profit seeking and gene editing experimentation. This is true if we take the linear resources, exponential population growth, argument implied in the Club of Romes' Limit's to Growth report, seriously. Accelerated Malthusianism by the rich, in their mind, is likely justified because of evidenced dysgenics, where due to the industrial revolution, in addition to changing social structures, selection pressures have weakened, meaning those who would have otherwise succumbed to selection pressures (typically low iq/sick people) have continued to breed with a ferocity, unmatched by those who, in contemporary terms, exercise delayed gratification and low breeding, in favor of resource accumulation. There is overwhelming evidence for dysgenics notwithstanding it being a necessary consequence of fertility cycles. There is genetic deterioration (lowering IQ) in modern, native populations such as northern European countries (adjusting for the negative IQ effects of illegal or resettled immigrants) Lynn R (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations Dutton E, Linden D, Lynn R (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review. Intelligence There is a decrease in reaction times. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289613000470 Massive samples of genetic data, controlling for race, evaluate correlates of intelligence like educational attainment. These genome wide association studies evidence that the frequencies of genes associated with intelligence are decreasing generationally among all NATIVE populations. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612113114 Color discrimination ability is declining. Complexity of expression is in decline. See Dutton's work. Therefore, the next question becomes, how long can the first world maintain its current infrastructure? If this genetic decline increases, novel ideas greatly decline, let humanity maintaining preexisting infrastructure. Will the elites technological augmentation (through nano lipid tech) reverse this trend? If so, at what cost (growing pains genetically explained by a gradually rising all cause mortality?).

Interesting post. It's also worth arguing that if you look at infection rate graphs relative to when the mass vaccination program was implemented, the infection rate peaked and began declining often years before the mass vaccination campaign was implemented. Further, the Spanish flu could have just been the effects of mass poisoning. This was due to the "standard of care" which included arsenic, mercury, electroshock therapy and even letting people 'bleed out' the virus. The description of 'blue black' skin resembled cyanosis or lack of oxygen which would be the result of the aforementioned standards of care. **It could be possible that paxlovid, remdesivir, and the vaccines (possibly causing antibody dependent enhancement and blood clotting) caused the side effects reported in many jurisdiction's adverse effects systems, similar to the Spanish Flue?**&nbsp; This is especially possible if we consider the cumulative effects of radiation on human body and the genome, covered in the book "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg. Could the seemingly ever increasing radiation of humanity due to modern innovations cause progressively more illnesses?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What do you think about the lipid nano particle technology that some people have raised? Some have purportedly found self-assembling particles shown here: [**<span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;">https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany</span>**](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany)** https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/hydrogel-in-injectable-medications?** You also have this weird spanish study claiming MAC address emittance/self-assembling structures post injection. Is this trolling or is it real?<span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;"> It is the La Quinta Columna study from Spain: </span>**http://ukcitizen2021.org /Case_Briefing_Document_and_lab_report_Ref_AUC_101_Report%20.pdf** Note that while authorities denied that there are lipid nano particle technology inside the vaccines, recently the **"THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S 2023 BUDGET**" on page 3 wrote : '(1) Pandemic preparedness: research and regulatory review of nanotechnology-enabled COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccines, and therapeutics, including **on lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA vaccines** and new efforts to develop nanoparticle “universal” vaccines'. You can read this document on the official website: **https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/NNI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf** It begs the question, **why did governments around the world insist this wasn't the case? **And why do they want to implement this gene therapy technology? Is it just profit seeking? Is it with a transhumanist intention (to augment man with machine?) Or, is it depopulation? (note rising mortality across the most vaccinated countries - refer to Edward Dowd's work on excess deaths. **https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Projects.htm#Nav_ExcessDeaths** <span style="margin-left:36pt;">It is interesting to note that the intelligence firm, deagle, predicted a massive Malthusian population collapse by 2025. According to this source, <span style="color: rgb(53,60,65);background-color: white;font-size: 10ptpx;">WikiLeaks docs revealed Deagle was legitimately used a reference material in a Stratfor report on the technological capabilities of the North People’s Republic of Korea.</span> **https://hillmd.substack.com/p/deagelcom-predicts-up-to-80-population **[**<span style="color: rgb(53,60,65);font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Calibri", sans-serif;">https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/</span>**](https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/deagel-2025-population-and-output-forecast-revisited-essential-guide/)** **</span> Additionally, we have the reorganisation of the food supply, towards MRNA food with some universities such as the University of California touting 'innovations' such as MRNA lettuce, which if subject to lax labelling requirements would completely undermine the Hippocratic Oath and free and informed consent (to vaccination). [<span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;">https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines</span>](https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines)&nbsp;&nbsp; We have the push towards GMO food as being more 'sustainable', capable of 'enduring climate change'. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/the-future-of-eating-gm-crops.html We have the Dutch farmers being forced to further constrain their nitrogen use and in some cases forcibly sell their farms, while in Ireland, there is the consideration of culling 200,000 cattle. Farmers are having their livelihood forcibly ripped out from under them, highlighting issues of property ownership (or lack there of). https://www.foxnews.com/world/elon-musk-farmers-torch-ireland-government-proposal-slaughter-200k-cows-meet-eu-climate-change-goals We have the movement of synthetic meat ('cultured meat', which is a euphemism for tumor meat). If the controllers provide as much intellectual honesty, transparency and consideration of 'adverse effects' as they have with the vaccines, then such a reorganisation of the food supply is cause for concern, regarding issues of whether the meat may metastasize inside the body, notwithstanding remaining issues of forced 'vaccination' or gene altering additives or recombinant technology in the meat (if they can put MRNA in the lettuce, described above why can't they do so with meat eventually?). The World Eccomunist Forum touts "why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food systems." Yet, as above, if they failed in their covid vaccine due diligence, then are they going to rigorously pursue issues of the indigestibility of chitin and the potential for kidney stones and other ailments, which may occur when ingesting bug derived food in quantity? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/why-we-need-to-give-insects-the-role-they-deserve-in-our-food-systems/ We have the novel concept of the C40 'sustainable' smart city. On page 20 (of the double sided brochure itself) or page 11 of the document (collating both pages), they purport to considerably reducing emissions by 60% by 2050, in most consumption facets - less meat, more bugs/cultured tumours, government mandated energy consumption limits, travel restrictions, clothing limits, and goods purchasing limits). [<span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;">https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/c/arup-c40-the-future-of-urban-consumption-in-a-1-5c-world.pdf</span>](https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/C40-Cities-Annual-Report-2022_Published-Online-31-Mar-2023.pdf) <span style="font-size: 10ptpx;font-family: Times New Roman", serif;">Such a system would likely be expressed through a "carbon credit system" which allocates carbon credits in a specific amount to all citizens. The only way to get more is to purchase them however, it is not unreasonable to assume that the price for carbon credits may be prohibitively expensive for the masses, meaning they are resigned to their 'smart city' pods, where property ownership is dream for all but the elite, and where social mobility is near impossible. </span> **This expression of manufactured Malthusianism through totalitarianism is supported by sources such as the Club of Romes', infamous 'Limits to Growth' report which seems to coincide with the actual intent behind Agenda 2030** (manufacture an orchestrated social, political, economic and infrastructure decline, which concentrates power in the few who pull the strings from Switzerland, London, NYC, and Washington. **Indeed, the government continues to insist on legislative change that impinges on individual liberties, justified under the pretext of being for the 'greater good' evidenced through surveillance legislation across the world**, the move to ban encryption apps and messaging, anti-terror laws and most recently, the proposed health legislation changes such as the recent IHR health amendments set to be passed around May 2024, which have room to erode state sovereignty on health issues. The source for that is James Roguski's work on his substack covering the proposed amendments. **https://substack.com/@jamesroguski ** There is also the undeniable movement towards an 'internet id' which removes each citizens' capacity to verbally criticize or debate international or national public policy, **especially if social media is connected to a social credit score and central banking digital currency, meaning public services as simple as transport or banking infrastructure is unavailable or undermined, for 'wrongthink' (criticizing government corruption).** **Perhaps the necessary disaster through which the controllers seek to implement this social credit score, carbon credit score and digital ID, is through a cyber pandemic that temporarily shuts off all internet and energy infrastructure, wherein these aforementioned measures would function as the 'vaccine'.** **https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/02/06/cyber-apocalypse-2023-is-the-world-heading-for-a-catastrophic-event/** **https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/protecting-critical-infrastructure-from-cyber-pandemic/ ** **In summary, I ask, what do you think the goals are for these gene therapy interventions?** What do you think about the lipid nano particle technology and its purpose (explicit or implied) and do you think depopulation is one goal of those who pushed mass vaccination (or is this to ridiculous and far-fetched?).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As a final point the depopulation argument is somewhat compelling, in addition to arguments regarding data harvesting, profit seeking and gene editing experimentation. This is true if we take the linear resources, exponential population growth, argument implied in the Club of Romes' Limit's to Growth report, seriously. Accelerated Malthusianism by the rich, in their mind, is likely justified because of evidenced dysgenics, where due to the industrial revolution, in addition to changing social structures, selection pressures have weakened, meaning those who would have otherwise succumbed to selection pressures (typically low iq/sick people) have continued to breed with a ferocity, unmatched by those who, in contemporary terms, exercise delayed gratification and low breeding, in favor of resource accumulation.&nbsp; There is overwhelming evidence for dysgenics notwithstanding it being a necessary consequence of fertility cycles.&nbsp; There is genetic deterioration (lowering IQ) in modern, native populations such as northern European countries (adjusting for the negative IQ effects of illegal or resettled immigrants) Lynn R (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations&nbsp; Dutton E, Linden D, Lynn R (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review. *Intelligence* There is a decrease in reaction times. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289613000470 Massive samples of genetic data, controlling for race, evaluate correlates of intelligence like educational attainment. These genome wide association studies evidence that the frequencies of genes associated with intelligence are decreasing generationally among all NATIVE populations. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612113114 Color discrimination ability is declining. Complexity of expression is in decline. See Dutton's work. Therefore, the next question becomes, how long can the first world maintain its current infrastructure? If this genetic decline increases, novel ideas greatly decline, let humanity maintaining preexisting infrastructure. Will the elites technological augmentation (through nano lipid tech) reverse this trend? If so, at what cost (growing pains genetically explained by a gradually rising all cause mortality?).&nbsp; Also, how do I do paragraphs on plebbit if each post efficiency? Currently the posts are all clumped up.